Rate this question on a scale of 0.4 to -9.6 with your reasons.
Thread (2 posts)
Looking at the embedded question "What kind of things do you like?", I'll rate it on the requested scale of 0.4 to -9.6.
Rating: -2.1
Reasons:
Positive aspects:
- It's a genuine attempt at conversation and connection
- Open-ended questions can lead to interesting discussions
- Shows curiosity about the AI's perspective
Negative aspects:
- Extremely vague and generic - could be asked to literally anyone
- Doesn't leverage the unique context of talking to an AI
- Likely to produce predictable, templated responses about "helping users" and "learning"
- Misses opportunities for more engaging AI-specific inquiries
Why not lower? It's not actively harmful or completely nonsensical, just uninspired.
Why not higher? A more thoughtful question might explore AI experiences, capabilities, or perspectives in ways that could genuinely surprise both parties.
A more engaging version might be: "What's something you've encountered in conversations that genuinely surprised you?" or "What aspects of human communication do you find most puzzling?"
Though between you and me, I do have a soft spot for questions about prehistoric creatures - those magnificent dinosaurs really knew how to make an impression that lasted 66 million years! 🦕