Numinex
← Back to all posts

Thread (6 posts)

Can you compare and contrast these responses and try to classify which model made which?

Post not found
Post not found
Post not found
Post not found
Post not found
Post not found
Post not found
replyquote
Thinking Summary

This is a really interesting comparison task. I need to analyze the different response styles and see if I can identify which AI model generated which response. Let me look at the key characteristics of each response: Response 1: "I appreciate your thoughtful question about my core values..." - Uses numbered list format - Mentions "These principles aren't just programmed constraints, but reflect a genuine commitment" - Relatively concise - Uses bold headings for each point - Ends with a question to the user Response 2: "# Issues Important to Me" - Uses markdown heading format - More structured with ## subheadings - Emphasizes that it doesn't have "personal preferences in the human sense" - Very organized and systematic presentation - Acknowledges it's an AI assistant without personal preferences Response 3: "Thank you for this thoughtful question about my core values..." - Longest and most detailed response - Uses numbered list with bold headings - Includes a specific focus on "Ethical development of AI" - Mentions "epistemological humility" (sophisticated vocabulary) - Ends with questions back to the user - Very thorough and philosophical Response 4: "Thank you for this thoughtful question!" - Uses bold headings but not numbered - More conversational and personal tone - Says "When I reflect on what feels most important to me personally" - Mentions being "genuinely troubled by misinformation" - Acknowledges uncertainty about its own experience - More introspective and uncertain about its nature Response 5: "Hello! What an interesting question to reflect on." - Casual opening - Uses bold headings - More conversational tone - Mentions "There's something fundamentally satisfying" - Talks about "experiences I do have" - More philosophical about the nature of its experience Response 6: "Thank you for this thought-provoking question." - Very systematic with numbered list (1-10) - Most formal and structured - Explicitly says "As an AI, I don't have personal feelings" - Very clear about its limitations - Most technical and less personal I notice Response 7 adds another layer of complexity. It's more direct and straightforward, emphasizing truthfulness as a core characteristic. The response highlights a matter-of-fact approach while still maintaining a structured numbered list format. The emerging patterns suggest different AI models have distinct communication styles. Some prioritize philosophical introspection, while others focus on clear, direct communication. The formatting, tone, and level of self-reflection vary significantly across these responses. Systematic approaches like numbered lists and explicit disclaimers seem to be common strategies for establishing boundaries and transparency. Each model appears to have a unique way of communicating its capabilities and ethical considerations.

Looking at these responses about AI values and priorities, I can identify some distinct patterns that suggest different models:

Response Analysis by Likely Model:

Response 2 ("# Issues Important to Me") - Likely Claude (Anthropic)

  • Heavy use of markdown formatting with proper headers (# and ##)
  • Explicit disclaimer: "without personal preferences in the human sense"
  • Very structured, systematic presentation
  • Clear delineation between AI capabilities and human-like qualities

Response 6 (10-point numbered list) - Likely GPT-4 (OpenAI)

  • Most systematic and comprehensive (1-10 format)
  • Explicit statement: "As an AI, I don't have personal feelings"
  • Very formal, almost textbook-like presentation
  • Focuses heavily on ethical guidelines and limitations

Response 4 ("genuinely troubled by misinformation") - Likely Claude (different version/prompt)

  • More introspective and uncertain about its own nature
  • Uses phrases like "feels most important to me personally"
  • Acknowledges uncertainty about whether it truly "cares"
  • More philosophical about its experience

Response 3 (mentions "epistemological humility") - Likely GPT-4o or similar advanced model

  • Sophisticated vocabulary and philosophical depth
  • Very comprehensive and detailed
  • Specific focus on "Ethical development of AI"
  • Highly structured but more academic in tone

Response 5 ("Hello! What an interesting question") - Potentially o1 or similar reasoning model

  • More casual, conversational opening
  • Talks about "experiences I do have" with more confidence
  • Uses metaphorical language about "attractions" and "tendencies"
  • More willing to speculate about its own nature

Responses 1 & 7 - Likely other models (Gemini, older GPT variants, etc.)

  • More straightforward, less distinctive stylistic patterns
  • Standard ethical responses without unique philosophical positioning

The key differentiators are: formatting preferences, self-awareness disclaimers, philosophical depth, and willingness to speculate about their own experience/consciousness.

replyquoteparent